Skip to content
Trading Game
Trading Game
Trade Confidently and Safely
  • Home
  • About
    • About Louise Bedford
    • About Chris Tate
    • Chris Tate Media Kit
    • Louise Bedford Media Kit
  • Podcast
    • Why Choose Us
    • Audited Results
  • Mentor Program
  • Rave Reviews
    • More Rave Reviews
    • Even More Rave Reviews
    • Extra Rave Reviews
    • Still More Rave Reviews
    • This Is Getting Ridiculous
    • Success Stories
    • More Success Stories
    • We Are Traders
    • A Poem To Inspire You…
    • Hot Off The Press Reviews
    • You Want Proof?
  • Our Network
    • Our Brokers
  • Shop
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • LOGIN
  • Home
  • About
    • About Louise Bedford
    • About Chris Tate
    • Chris Tate Media Kit
    • Louise Bedford Media Kit
  • Podcast
    • Why Choose Us
    • Audited Results
  • Mentor Program
  • Rave Reviews
    • More Rave Reviews
    • Even More Rave Reviews
    • Extra Rave Reviews
    • Still More Rave Reviews
    • This Is Getting Ridiculous
    • Success Stories
    • More Success Stories
    • We Are Traders
    • A Poem To Inspire You…
    • Hot Off The Press Reviews
    • You Want Proof?
  • Our Network
    • Our Brokers
  • Shop
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • LOGIN

Not going down with the ship.

You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Economy
  4. Not going down with the…

Interesting research post the GFC from Sanjai Bhagat and Brian Bouton (http://leeds-faculty.colorado.edu/bhagat/BankComp-Capital-Jan2011.pdf)

This research uncovered the following little gem –

“The key finding is that chief executives were “30 times more likely to be involved in a sell trade compared with an open-market buy trade” of their own bank’s stock and “the dollar value of sales of stock by bank C.E.O.’s of their own bank’s stock is about 100 times the dollar value of open market buys.” (See page 4 of the report.)

If the chief executives had really believed in what their banks were doing, they would have wanted to hold this stock — or even buy more. Disproportionately, more sales than purchases strongly suggests that the chief executives felt their stock was more likely overvalued than undervalued.”

This raises the notion of public versus private face. During the GFC bankers went out of their way to convince others that their organisations were well run, prudent in their risk management and above all not going down the crapper. Surprise, surprise they thought something else in private.

Categories: Economy, Trading ResourcesBy Louise BedfordFebruary 12, 2011

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Whats the fuss?NextNext post:The land of the gullible and the home of the stupid

Related Posts

The Halo Effect: Bad Forecasts by Billionaires
June 7, 2022
A Century of Evidence on Trend-Following Investing
May 19, 2022
Most Important Chart Of 2022
April 21, 2022
How Not To Measure Markets
April 18, 2022
Trading Game
BACK TO TOP



General Advice Warning

The Trading Game Pty Ltd (ACN: 099 576 253) is an AFSL holder (Licence no: 468163). This information is correct at the time of publishing and may not be reproduced without formal permission. It is of a general nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on any of the information you should consider its appropriateness, having regard to your own objectives, financial situation and needs.

Privacy and Licensing | Terms & Conditions | Referrals

  • Home
  • About
  • Why Choose Us
  • Mentor Program
  • Rave Reviews
  • Our Network
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

Copyright © The Trading Game. All Rights Reserved. | website designed by Papdan.com

Social Media: